Friday, 4 May 2012

Secular Café: Petition President Obama to End National Day of Prayer

Secular Café
For serious discussion of politics, political news, policy, political theory and economics and events happening round the world
Petition President Obama to End National Day of Prayer
May 4th 2012, 21:35

http://www.atheistrev.com/2012/05/pe...ma-to-end.html

I have....needed to set up an account first, though.....

Quote:

The Freedom From Religion Foundation has set up an online petition on the White House website, urging President Obama to end the National Day of Prayer. In order to get the petition to Obama, 25,000 electronic signatures are needed by May 31. At the time I am posting this, they only have 2,151. Let's get the word out about this and help them meet their goal.

I know some of you are skeptical that this effort will amount to anything, and I share your skepticism. This White House petition site has been used to get a number of sensible proposals before the Obama administration, only to have them reject them outright. It is easy to imagine that happening yet again. But I don't think that should be an excuse for inaction. We need to keep trying until we succeed. We need to let this and each subsequent administration hear from us until this unconstitutional practice is finally stopped.

For more about what you can do to help, see this post at Secular News Daily.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Secular Café: US Senator has a go at Murdoch

Secular Café
For serious discussion of politics, political news, policy, political theory and economics and events happening round the world
US Senator has a go at Murdoch
May 4th 2012, 17:23

http://www.secularcafe.org/usernote.php?u=2583

Quote:

Rupert Murdoch's global media empire is facing a challenge on a new front in the billowing phone-hacking scandal after a powerful US Senate committee opened direct contact with British investigators in an attempt to find out whether News Corporation has broken American laws.

Jay Rockefeller, chairman of the Senate committee on commerce, science and transportation, has written to Lord Justice Leveson, who leads the British judicial inquiry into media ethics, asking if he has uncovered any evidence relating questionable practices in the US.

"I would like to know whether any of the evidence you are reviewing suggests that these unethical and sometimes illegal business practices occurred in the United States or involved US citizens," Rockefeller writes in a letter released on Wednesday.

The development adds to the potential dangers facing News Corp, a publicly-traded company with its headquarters in New York. Rockefeller has taken a close interest in the unfolding phone-hacking saga, but it is the first time that a Senate committee member has acted in his official capacity.

Should the committee decide to press its case, it has considerable powers at its disposal. It could convene official Senate hearings into the scandal and subpoena witnesses and documents from News Corp – though as yet there is no discussion of doing so.

The commerce committee covers all means of communications in the US – including telecommunications, free-to-air broadcasting and cable TV. It also has oversight over the Federal Communications Commission, the regulatory body that has final say on the issuing of broadcast licences, including the 27 licences issued to the Fox TV network that is the jewel in Murdoch's crown...

...Rockefeller's intervention was triggered by the final report of the British parliament's culture, media and sport select committee, which concluded that Murdoch was not fit to run a major international company. It comes two weeks after Mark Lewis, a British lawyer at the forefront of the phone-hacking investigations, opened investigations into four cases of alleged phone hacking that occurred in the US...

...On the same day as the Senate commerce committee made its move, a second US senator, Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey, renewed his call for a US government investigation into whether News Corp broke anti-bribery and corruption laws. Lautenberg called for a robust inquiry into whether the company, by allegedly bribing public officials in he UK, had breached the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which forbids American citizens or companies from engaging in acts of bribery abroad
Any chance that Fox News will be affected?

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Secular Café: Barnes & Noble: 1 week as a Microsoft partner,and censoring publications.

Secular Café
For serious discussion of politics, political news, policy, political theory and economics and events happening round the world
Barnes & Noble: 1 week as a Microsoft partner,and censoring publications.
May 4th 2012, 11:12

http://tuxradar.com/content/learn-ha...rnes-and-noble

Rumour (and it is just rumour) has it that M$ were the complainant. But for a bookshop to pull publications from sale.....that's not good...........

Quote:

We've just learned that issue 154 of Linux Format, the one with 'Learn to Hack' on the cover, was removed from Barnes and Noble bookstores in the US after a complaint was made. We'd like to apologise if you were affected and couldn't find a copy

As a reminder, we've put the contents of the main feature online: http://www.tuxradar.com/content/learn-hack

Here's a quote from Bruce Schneier's Crypto-Gram Newsletter from August 2003 where he announces his book 'Beyond Fear', and explains why demystifying security is so important:

"This is a book for everyone. I believe that security, as a topic, is something we all can understand. And even more importantly, I believe that the subject is just too critical, too integral a part of our everyday lives, to be left exclusively in the hands of experts. By demystifying security, I hope to encourage all of us to think more sensibly about the topic, to contribute to what should be an open and informed public discussion of security, and to participate vocally in ongoing security negotiations in our civic, professional, and personal lives."

We feel exactly the same, which is why we ran that feature.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Thursday, 3 May 2012

Secular Café: Calls Grow For Cardinal In Ireland To Resign

Secular Café
For serious discussion of politics, political news, policy, political theory and economics and events happening round the world
Calls Grow For Cardinal In Ireland To Resign
May 4th 2012, 00:43

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/04/wo...sign.html?_r=1

The scumbag should not only resign...he should be arrested and tried.

Quote:

DUBLIN — Pressure is building on the leader of the Catholic Church in Ireland, Cardinal Sean Brady, to resign in the wake of damaging accusations made against him in a BBC television documentary about his role in a secret inquiry into clerical sexual abuse.

Abuse survivors, senior government ministers, serving priests, canon lawyers, newspaper editorials, police officials, human rights groups and the head of the country's biggest children's charity were among those calling on the cardinal to step down Thursday over his failure 37 years ago to report damning evidence against the Rev. Brendan Smyth. That failure allowed Father Smyth to continue abusing children for at least another 13 years.

Father Smyth, who died in prison at age 70, was convicted in the 1990s and admitted to molesting and raping about 100 children in Ireland and the United States.

Speaking in Parliament, Deputy Prime Minister Eamon Gilmore on Thursday described the disclosures in the BBC program as "another horrific episode of failure by senior members of the Catholic Church to protect children" and said the cardinal should resign for failing to report the accusations.

Prime Minister Enda Kenny, who delivered a landmark speech last year denouncing Vatican interference in investigations into clerical sexual abuse, said the office he held precluded him from calling for the cardinal's resignation but on Wednesday he said the primate should "reflect" on the contents of the BBC program.

Northern Ireland's deputy first minister, Martin McGuinness, a Catholic, said the cardinal's decision to remain on would "leave many Catholics wondering whether anything is to be done by the leadership of the Catholic Church to ring the changes which many believe are required at such a sad time for all."

The calls for Cardinal Brady's resignation were echoed by Fergus Finlay, the chief executive of the children's charity Barnardo's, who said the cardinal had a "moral responsibility" to follow up on what he had heard and "to break ranks if he discovered nothing had been done."

Cardinal Brady has insisted that his role in the 1975 internal church investigation was secretarial in nature and that he had fulfilled his duty by passing on to his superior accurate transcripts of meetings with children alleging abuse.

However, the BBC documentary, which was shown Tuesday, produced handwritten documents concerning one such interrogation involving Brendan Boland, a 14-year-old who came forward to accuse Father Smyth. In the documents, Father Brady, not yet a prelate, described himself as having been "dispatched to investigate the complaint," prompting accusations that he bore greater responsibility than he has admitted.

"The documentation of the interview with Brendan Boland, signed in his presence, clearly identifies me as the 'notary' or 'note taker,' " the cardinal said in a statement in response to the program. "Any suggestion that I was other than a notary in the process of recording evidence from Mr. Boland is false and misleading."

Cardinal Brady said he "felt betrayed" on learning almost two decades later that the notes he had passed on had not been acted upon by his superiors, leaving the way for Father Smyth to abuse numerous other children, including those named in the interview by Mr. Boland.

His critics rejected the cardinal's version of events. Sam Adair, one of those abused by Father Smyth after 1975, told Ireland's national broadcaster RTE: "The facts of the matter are that this man was a leading, skilled canon lawyer, highly paid and sought after, and promoted to the highest rank of the Roman Catholic Church in Europe. He was a skilled canon lawyer; he was not a note-taker."

Father Smyth, one of Ireland's most notorious clerical pedophiles, was moved from parish to parish for 40 years, leaving a trail of accusations in his wake. He was first jailed in a sexual abuse case in 1994 in Northern Ireland. On his release in 1997, he was extradited to the Irish Republic, where he was sentenced to 12 more years; he died having served less than a year.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Wednesday, 2 May 2012

Secular Café: Thank god no white folks were in the band bus at FAMU

Secular Café
For serious discussion of politics, political news, policy, political theory and economics and events happening round the world
Thank god no white folks were in the band bus at FAMU
May 3rd 2012, 00:47

13 people charged but do not face second degree murder even though they collectively beat Robert Champion to death.

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/05/02/ju...-famu-charges/

On the other hand, Zimmerman was set free and then arrested and charged with second degree murder after the brouhaha from the black community. Can't help but wonder where Jesse and Al are? FAMU needs them.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Secular Café: Texas AG Brands Planned Parenthood as Terrorists

Secular Café
For serious discussion of politics, political news, policy, political theory and economics and events happening round the world
Texas AG Brands Planned Parenthood as Terrorists
May 2nd 2012, 12:11

http://www.care2.com/causes/texas-ag...errorists.html

:eek:

Quote:

In support of its motion to stay a district court order requiring the state of Texas to continue funding Planned Parenthood Texas Attorney General Greg Abbot argued the women's health care provider is, essentially, a terrorist organization.

"Planned Parenthood does not provide any assurance that the tax subsidies it receives from the Women's Health Program have not been used directly or indirectly to subsidize its advocacy of elective abortion," Abbott wrote in his motion to stay the injunction. "Nor is it possible for Planned Parenthood to provide this assurance."

"Money is fungible, and taxpayer subsidies — even if 'earmarked' for nonabortion activities — free up other resources for Planned Parenthood to spend on its mission to promote elective abortions … (because '[m]oney is fungible,' First Amendment does not prohibit application of federal material-support statute to individuals who give money to 'humanitarian' activities performed by terrorist organizations)."

By invoking the federal material-support statute, which makes it a felony to give money to a terrorist organization, even if the funds are specified for nonterrorist activities, the state of Texas has formally introduced for "serious" legal debate the idea that supporting health care organizations that provide reproductive health care services is equivalent to supporting terrorists.

Abbot is playing a dangerous game here. Either he truly believes Planned Parenthood and its supporters are terrorists and terrorist-sympathizers, in which case they could face prosecution under the material support statute, or Abbot is purely playing politics. And if that is the case, not only is that ethically suspect, it is actually endangering the lives of the nearly 130,000 low-income women who rely on Planned Parenthood for cancer screens and family planning services.

The 5th Circuit will issue a final ruling on the stay but it is likely to affirm, meaning that for the foreseeable future poor women in Texas will be left with little in the way of access to reliable and affordable health care.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Secular Café: Removing Urban Highways

Secular Café
For serious discussion of politics, political news, policy, political theory and economics and events happening round the world
Removing Urban Highways
May 2nd 2012, 10:12

The latest wrinkle in urban planning? Removing urban highways or else burying them.

Urban Highways Offer Cities New Opportunities for Revitalization | TheCityFix
End of the Roads: When Highway Removal Works – Next American City
Urban Highway Removal: To Your Health – Next American City
Making cities more friendly to alternatives to cars lets people walk, bike, or use public transit more -- and get more exercise and become healthier than they otherwise would be.

Some successes in removing urban highways:
Seoul tears down an urban highway and the city can breathe again | Grist
San Francisco's Embarcadero | Congress for the New Urbanism
Portland's Harbor Drive | Congress for the New Urbanism
Milwaukee's Park East Freeway | Congress for the New Urbanism

Boston's one was buried instead of being removed, but the great expense of doing so has overshadowed its positive outcomes:
Removing Urban Highways: Thank the Big Dig : Mike the Mad Biologist

Freeways Without Futures 2012 | Congress for the New Urbanism
lists some in various stages of planning:
Quote:

1. I-10/Claiborne Overpass, New Orleans
2. I-895/Sheridan Expressway, New York City (Bronx)
3. Route 34/Oak Street Connector, New Haven
4. Route 5/Skyway, Buffalo
5. I-395/Overtown Expressway, Miami
6. I-70, St. Louis
7. West Shoreway, Cleveland
8. I-490/Inner Loop, Rochester
9. I-81, Syracuse
10. Gardiner Expressway, Toronto
11. Aetna Viaduct, Hartford
12. Route 99/Alaskan Way Viaduct, Seattle
That's a nice idea, but I'm concerned that it may become of the victim of the US culture wars, as high-speed trains have (Trains: the latest culture war - Secular Café). Consider the US right wing's willingness to object to *anything* that their villains like, even when doing so is *totally* contrary to their most cherished principles. They've taken the side of employee rights and wasteful government spending (Bill Clinton's firing of those travel agents), pacifism (Clinton's wars), junk food (Michelle Obama on healthy food), etc. and denounced Romneycare when it became Obamacare. Given this track record, I wouldn't be surprised if "movement conservatives" start defending urban highways and denouncing plans to remove them.

Michele Bachmann, George Will, and Newt Gingrich have claimed that liberals want to force everybody onto trains, with the latter two adding that liberals want to force everybody out of cars. This seems like something out of a grove of John Birch trees, but that's what they said. It would be a small step from there to denouncing highway removal as a similar sort of conspiracy against cars and freedom of travel.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions