Friday, 26 October 2012

Secular Café: What's the "Arab Spring" worth in Egypt?

Secular Café
For serious discussion of politics, political news, policy, political theory and economics and events happening round the world
What's the "Arab Spring" worth in Egypt?
Oct 26th 2012, 12:27

Many activists risked their lives in the recent struggle for basic human rights in Egypt. Are the hopes of women in particular going to be crushed? See this article:

http://articles.latimes.com/2012/oct...ution-20121008

Quote:

Eman Mostafa, a village girl from southern Egypt, was shot and killed last month when she dared to spit in the face of the man who groped her.

Ramadan Salem told authorities he mistakenly shot Mostafa, 16, after she cursed him. It is uncertain whether Salem will be convicted: The only witness willing to testify — Mostafa's friend, Sahar Mamdouh — has been threatened in a society that often blames women and girls for provoking sexual crimes against them.

After an uprising toppled President Hosni Mubarak early last year, women and minorities hoped for a nation that would guarantee long-denied equal rights. But their pleas have gone unanswered as Egypt has shifted from military control to the conservative designs of a new Islamist president. Mostafa's death symbolizes for many women the prospect that civil rights would be further jeopardized by a new constitution.

Scores of Egyptians, with the support of 33 women's rights organizations, protested outside President Mohamed Morsi's palace last week against the proposed constitution, particularly Article 36, which says the state is "committed to providing all measures to ensure the equality of women with men, as long as those rights are not contradicting the laws of Islam," or sharia...

...Yet Islamists are the country's main political force, and they will probably control the tone of a constitution in what has become a pivotal battle between liberals and Islamists who run the gamut from ultraconservative Salafis to the more moderate Muslim Brotherhood. The struggle is tilted in favor of the Islamists because women's groups and liberal parties are often divided and disorganized.

"Equality should be a given, with no conditions. This [article] is strictly meant to hinder the women's rights movements and the way women express themselves. It is meant to target basic rights that women fought for decades ago," said Dalia Abdelhameed, a researcher with the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Wednesday, 24 October 2012

Secular Café: Cultural identity war over Disney's Latina Princess Sofia.

Secular Café
For serious discussion of politics, political news, policy, political theory and economics and events happening round the world
Cultural identity war over Disney's Latina Princess Sofia.
Oct 24th 2012, 18:47

Poor Princess BBC reported she had a Scandinavian Father
from a fantasy land and a Latin Mother from a fantasy land.

This did not turn out good. She had blue eyes and too light or fair skin.
So a kind of verbal war has started. Activists wanting Disney to do it right
instead of this half measure.

I mean having a Scandinavian Father how can that represent all the Latinos
in USA?

I have not checked up how many Latinos we do have in Sweden but
they are rather many? Or have been and have went back to South America?
Here is link to the text and video that CNN chose to have.
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/10/19/sh...ess/index.html
Just found it using a hasty search I heard it on BBC World Service.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Secular Café: Phone hacking and Piers Morgan

Secular Café
For serious discussion of politics, political news, policy, political theory and economics and events happening round the world
Phone hacking and Piers Morgan
Oct 24th 2012, 07:50

Piers Morgan (aka Piers Moron in Private Eye) has done his best to leave his tabloid-editing past behind him, but it may be catching up with him.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/me...r-8223424.html

Quote:

Ever since he left The Daily Mirror under a cloud in 2004, Piers Morgan has gone to some lengths to put his newspaper days behind him. As if to emphasise his credentials as a transatlantic chatshow host, he gave his evidence to the Leveson Inquiry via a videolink from Los Angeles.

But try as he might, the former showbusiness gossip columnist who has reinvented himself as CNN's main weapon in America's rating wars has yet to shrug off the miasma of allegations generated by the News of the World phone hacking scandal...

...Ironically, many of the claims that resurface against Morgan owe their origin to the man himself. In his autobiography, The Insider, the former editor details how an unnamed individual described to him the practice of hacking phones in 2001 and another incident in April 2000 in which the actress Kate Winslet asked him how he had got hold of a new phone number for her.

During the Leveson Inquiry, Morgan was asked about a lunch in 2002 with television presenter Ulrika Jonsson and Jeremy Paxman in which the BBC Newsnight presenter said the newspaperman had shown him how to prevent his voicemails being eavesdropped and implied he knew the contents of conversations between Jonsson and then England football manager Sven Goran Eriksson. Morgan laughed off Paxman's claims, saying he could not recall details.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Tuesday, 23 October 2012

Confirm your unsubscription from 'Secular Café'

To confirm that you no longer wish to receive updates from 'Secular Café', please click on the following link:

http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/confirm/7N7qWw/5jLwcw


If you weren't expecting to receive this email, then simply ignore it and we'll go away.

Confirm your unsubscription from 'Secular Café'

To confirm that you no longer wish to receive updates from 'Secular Café', please click on the following link:

http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/confirm/7N7qWw/7nNQ5


If you weren't expecting to receive this email, then simply ignore it and we'll go away.

Secular Café: Is Britain's semi-detached EU status viable?

Secular Café
For serious discussion of politics, political news, policy, political theory and economics and events happening round the world
Is Britain's semi-detached EU status viable?
Oct 23rd 2012, 06:33

Can it survive in the long term?

The British have always been divided on the issue of EU membership. They kept out of the original founding group because at the time Britain saw itself as a world power and focused far more on the Commonwealth than on Continental Europe. In fact for a long time most Britons denied being "Europeans".

Of course, there have always been plenty of "Eurosceptics" in other member countries too, but such is British bloody-mindedness that this tendency has always been strongest in Britain. When Britain was already a member, it was necessary in 1975 to have a referendum on continued membership of what was then the European Economic Community (EEC). I remember campaigning then in favour of membership, which seemed clearly in Britain's economic interest.

However, few people then were in favour of becoming part of a federal European super-state. The eurocrats, however, were always working towards that goal, and doing so with a minimum of democracy. Britain managed to negotiate an opt-out from the euro, signalling that it was not going in that political direction. The euro collapse has convinced eurozone leaders that they need to hasten integration, and all the signs are that European federalism will progress further and quite fast.

Britain still wants an economic union, but not a federal one.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-20026811

Quote:

Prime Minister David Cameron has promised to ensure the UK's interests are defended as eurozone countries move towards a banking union.

He told MPs there had been "limited progress", but added that this should not affect the "single market".

Mr Cameron also called for a "rigorous settlement" to ensure the EU's budget does not rise by more than inflation...

...Mr Cameron said: "Britain's banks will be supervised by the Bank of England... but we do need eurozone members to get on and form a banking union."

He also pledged to fight to make sure the EU's budget would not increase by more than the rate of inflation over the next few years, saying: "We have not put in place tough requirements in Britain to go to the EU and agree to big increases.

"I put down a marker that we need a rigorous settlement."

The German government has denied reports that Chancellor Angela Merkel is prepared to cancel next month's EU summit unless Mr Cameron lifts a threat to veto a rise in the budget...

...Mr Cameron has said a referendum would be the "simplest" way of establishing the UK's future position in the EU, should such a matter arise.

Conservative MP Philip Davies argued this would not go far enough, and leaving the EU should be an option, saying: "He may find an in/out referendum undesirable, but I find his in/in referendum equally unacceptable. Only an in/out referendum will do for the British people, it will be in his very much best interests if he would stop resisting it."

Mr Cameron replied that, on this issue, he did not agree with his colleague, adding: "Many people, me included, are not satisfied with the status quo, and that's why the in option is not acceptable.

"But many people, also like me, do not want us to leave altogether because of the importance of the single market to Britain, a trading nation, so they don't want to be out. That's why I think an in/out referendum isn't the right answer."
Here's a German view:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/...-a-861294.html

Quote:

The new approach has sweeping consequences for the European Union. Cameron's stance has already prompted the Germans to rethink their approach. Chancellor Angela Merkel had long hoped that a permanent division of the EU could be avoided. She had repeatedly said privately that one should not give the British the feeling that they are no longer part of Europe, and that the door must be kept open for London.

Those hopes have now been dashed. The German government is convinced that the Euro Group will be the core of a new, more deeply integrated Europe.

Each additional step toward closer cooperation in the euro zone deepens the rift within the EU. The Germans are also unwilling to wait for the British to come around in other areas, such as foreign and defense policy. Ironically, Europe threatens to split the year the EU is being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize...

...This goes well beyond the two-speed Europe outlined by German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble years ago. On the one side of the current divide is a hard core of countries that want to work together more closely. On the other side are countries like Great Britain, Denmark and Sweden, which are essentially condemned to be spectators if they no longer wish to join the rest. The dream of an expanding and more tightly integrated Greater Europe is over.

The French have no objections, given that they stand to benefit from this development. The individual countries would shape policy in the euro zone, which is what Paris has always preferred. The European Commission would lose some of its influence, while the Mediterranean countries would receive a stronger voice and Germany's power would wane...

...From the German perspective, the British always provided a counterweight to the French penchant for government control over the economy and trade barriers. For Berlin, they guaranteed that the EU did not compete with the United States on the global political stage. That was why Merkel long opposed any development that would permanently leave Great Britain behind.

But the Cameron administration's unwillingness to compromise leaves the German government with no choice. Berlin's official position continues to be that all integration steps must be fundamentally available to all EU members. But in reality the chancellor has long since come to terms with the fact that there will no longer be a path back to the center of the union for the British.

In a closed-door meeting with European Commission President José Manuel Durão Barroso in Bonn last Thursday, Merkel explained her proposal to develop a separate budget for the euro zone. Her advisors envision that the money will be earmarked for targeted measures to promote growth in euro-zone countries. If Merkel's idea prevails, it will be a reflection, in terms of fiscal policy, that there are now two European communities under the umbrella of the EU.

Barroso, who opposes the idea, told Merkel that a separate budget for the euro zone would only expedite the split within the EU. The Portuguese politician also has his own role in mind. The Commission has a strong position in the 27-member EU, but in the Euro Group, the leaders of the individual member states largely hold the reins. But Merkel is not backing down, and her proposal is still expected to be on the table at this week's EU summit.

Fiscal issues aren't the only area in which Berlin intends to proceed without London in the future. Berlin also doesn't want to be reined in when it comes to security and defense policy, which seemed to make little sense without Great Britain until now.

German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, together with his counterparts in France and Poland, is determined to promote cooperation on security policy in the EU. Last fall, the British blocked an attempt by the other 26 EU member states to establish a joint headquarters for military missions. Now the plan is to be revived and implemented, even against London's resistance, if necessary...

...People in Brussels and in many member states are so upset about Britain's behavior that a scenario is becoming conceivable that all sides had hoped to avoid until now: If the many opponents of Europe among the Tories prevail, the European treaties will have to be renegotiated...

...the fear that has senior crisis managers in Brussels worried at the moment. Greece's financial problems are no longer at the top of their list, but rather the possible departure of one of Europe's largest countries.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Secular Café: The Franco-German gulf

Secular Café
For serious discussion of politics, political news, policy, political theory and economics and events happening round the world
The Franco-German gulf
Oct 23rd 2012, 07:30

It was predictable before the French elections that if Hollande was elected on his manifesto there would be trouble between France and Germany. Now it's pretty bad.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/...-a-862644.html

Quote:

Since the days of former German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer and former French President Charles de Gaulle, Germany and France have generally been run by politicians who placed more value on unity than their differences. The axis between former German Chancellor Helmut Schmidt and former French President Valéry d'Estaing axis proved to be just as resilient as the partnership between their successors, Helmut Kohl and Francois Mitterand.

Under Merkel and Hollande, however, the German-French partnership threatens to deteriorate into nothing but a façade. The two politicians, who hold the fate of the continent in their hands, greet each other politely with kisses on the cheek, and their respective public relations staffs extol their "professional" and "trusting" cooperation.

In truth, however, the relationship began on a cool note and has since slipped below the freezing point. Hollande doesn't want to forgive Merkel for having campaigned for his conservative opponent, former President Nicolas Sarkozy. Now the Chancellery suspects that Hollande is secretly planning a campaign for Merkel's challenger from the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), former Finance Minister Peer Steinbrück.

Mistrust shapes the relationship between Paris and Berlin, on issues ranging from future European bank regulation to the joint aerospace and defense group EADS and the future architecture of Europe. Hollande suspects that Berlin is using budget consolidation as an excuse to gain European dominance. Merkel notes with unease that Hollande is joining forces with Rome and Madrid to form a joint axis against Germany...

...In recent months, impatience with Germany has grown to open displeasure at the Elysée Palace. Hollande believes that the crisis can only be solved if Europe introduces shared liability for debts. His staff is constantly introducing new proposals that tend to differ in name only: euro bonds, euro bills, a debt repayment fund.

The French are also annoyed that Berlin is incessantly calling for strict budget controls while the continent slips into recession. Paris is critical of what it calls Germany's obsession with austerity, and it believes that cutting spending in a sagging economy is the wrong approach. "A fundamental discussion of this austerity policy is in the air throughout Europe," say officials at the Elysée.

Hollande accuses the Germans of having double standards. He argues that they are demanding a lot of other Europeans while unilaterally pursuing national interests, as was the case with aircraft maker EADS. The German-French group wanted to merge with the British defense contractor BAE, which would have created the world's largest aerospace company, but it would also have jeopardized jobs in Bavaria...

...The journalistic broadside that Hollande fired at the Germans before the EU summit was a "remarkable move," sources within Merkel's administration say diplomatically. Translation: It was "incredibly impudent."

Merkel apparently sees the interview as evidence of the Frenchman's political inexperience. Hollande is a novice in the business of governing, Berlin officials say disparagingly. Unlike his predecessor Sarkozy, he had not held any government posts before becoming president. This is why, from Germany's perspective, he is making mistakes that would never have happened to his predecessors, especially in European policy.

The Germans are particularly dismayed over Hollande's attempt to paint himself as the spokesman of the southern EU countries. It upsets them that the Frenchman is reviving old plans for a Mediterranean union on Europe's southern edge...

... The two sides have accused each other of playing with marked cards ever since the unsuccessful June summit in Brussels.

At the time, the Germans and the French had agreed to develop a joint European financial regulatory agency, which was to bail out ailing banks if necessary. The French interpreted the agreement to mean that the so-called banking union was to commence on Jan. 1, 2013, but that apparently didn't coincide with the German view. In Berlin, officials fear that if the launch date is too early, Germany will be stuck with large liabilities for struggling Southern European banks.

The disagreement led to an open quarrel. In mid-September, German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble said publicly that the launch date was not to be. His French counterpart, Pierre Moscovici, was furious. "No, I don't agree with Mr. Schäuble," he said after a meeting in Cyprus, noting that there was no reason to delay...

...With the number of German-French conflicts on the rise, the erstwhile engine of European unification has now become a braking factor instead. The entire EU is waiting for Germany and France to finally reach a compromise over the future architecture of the euro, but Berlin's and Paris's ideas on the issue are still far apart.

Chancellor Merkel insists that Brussels should be able to monitor national budgets in the future. "We should give Europe real rights of intervention in national budgets," she said in the Bundestag last week.

Hollande opposes the idea. In addition, a transfer of sovereignty rights would require amending European treaties, which could be discussed at an EU convention, the results of which would have to be approved by the people in France. Hollande, however, fears that the majority of Frenchmen could say "non" to a referendum, as they did in a 2005 referendum on the European constitution. The French president envisions things basically remaining unchanged in Europe, with the heads of state and government continuing to have the last word.

If an amendment to the treaties is to be discussed at all, it will have to include the so-called communitization of debt, says Hollande, in reply to German thoughts on the issue. But this would be "out of the question" as long as "there are individual national budgets," the chancellor said after the summit.

The fronts are hardened, and time is running out. Under the agreement reached by the European leaders, the EU reforms should be approved by December, if possible.

Much is at stake. If the quarreling partners don't find a convincing solution, the euro crisis could intensify even further, with unforeseeable consequences for all of Europe. The fear of a crash is the one sentiment Paris and Berlin still share wholeheartedly, and it's what Europeans are relying on.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions