The question seems to be justified because they have been winning almost every battle since the seventies.
I have had ample experience with both Capitalist and non-Capitalist meetings, conferences, caucuses, brain-storming sessions, whatever you want to call it.
There was the same amount of aimlessness, silliness, stupidity, manipulation and downright malice in both.
The major difference, as I see it, is in the power-structure.
In Capitalist groups the structure is dominated by fear of those above you in the hierarchy (I often call it a 'fear-structure' ).
The one, at the very top of this fear-structure, is in a position to ruthlessly enforce his main objective: maximize profit for the company, or failing that, his bonus in the next CEO-compensation-package.
In non-Capitalist groups you have this major element of fear missing, so the exercise is not as focused as in the Capitalist fear-dominated sessions.
Besides, we socialists have scruples, principles and don't have a clearly defined objective.
The capitalists don't have the scruples and the principles and their objectives are VERY clearly defined: they want it all.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.